Assignment 3 probation and punishment

Assignment 3: Probation and Punishment

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Assignment 3 probation and punishment
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Criteria

 

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations

60-69% D

 

Fair

70-79% C

 

Proficient

80-89% B

 

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Outline your findings from your review of the file of Kris, for whom Robert is considering probation. State whether or not your results from the file review match Robert’s. Explain two (2) instances in which your views and those of Robert are both similar and different.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletelyoutline your findings from your review of the file of Kris, for whom Robert is considering probation. Did not submit or incompletely state whether or not your results from the file review match Robert’s.Did not submit or incompletely explain two (2) instances in which your views and those of Robert are both similar and different.

Insufficientlyoutlined your findings from your review of the file of Kris, for whom Robert is considering probation. Insufficiently stated whether or not your results from the file review match Robert’s. Insufficiently explained two (2) instances in which your views and those of Robert are both similar and different.

Partiallyoutlined your findings from your review of the file of Kris, for whom Robert is considering probation.Partiallystated whether or not your results from the file review match Robert’s.Partiallyexplained two (2) instances in which your views and those of Robert are both similar and different.

Satisfactorilyoutlined your findings from your review of the file of Kris, for whom Robert is considering probation.Satisfactorilystated whether or not your results from the file review match Robert’s.Satisfactorilyexplained two (2) instances in which your views and those of Robert are both similar and different.

Thoroughlyoutlined your findings from your review of the file of Kris, for whom Robert is considering probation.Thoroughlystated whether or not your results from the file review match Robert’s.Thoroughlyexplained two (2) instances in which your views and those of Robert are both similar and different.

2. Develop a profile of the so-called perfect candidate to participate in an intensive supervised probation program. The profile should contain at least three (3) attributes that you believe make this defendant the perfect candidate for this type of probation.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletelydeveloped a profile of the so-called perfect candidate to participate in an intensive supervised probation program.

Insufficientlydeveloped a profile of the so-called perfect candidate to participate in an intensive supervised probation program.

Partiallydeveloped a profile of the so-called perfect candidate to participate in an intensive supervised probation program.

Satisfactorilydeveloped a profile of the so-called perfect candidate to participate in an intensive supervised probation program.

Thoroughlydeveloped a profile of the so-called perfect candidate to participate in an intensive supervised probation program.

3. Defend or critique the strategy of matching the inmate to the correctional facility as a response to the legal concept of cruel and unusual punishment. Provide a rationale for your position with concrete examples.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletelydefended or critiqued the strategy of matching the inmate to the correctional facility as a response to the legal concept of cruel and unusual punishment. Did not submit or incompletelyprovided a rationale for your position with concrete examples.

Insufficientlydefended or critiqued the strategy of matching the inmate to the correctional facility as a response to the legal concept of cruel and unusual punishment.Insufficientlyprovided a rationale for your position with concrete examples.

Partiallydefended or critiqued the strategy of matching the inmate to the correctional facility as a response to the legal concept of cruel and unusual punishment.Partiallyprovided a rationale for your position with concrete examples.

Satisfactorilydefended or critiqued the strategy of matching the inmate to the correctional facility as a response to the legal concept of cruel and unusual punishment.Satisfactorilyprovided a rationale for your position with concrete examples.

Thoroughlydefended or critiqued the strategy of matching the inmate to the correctional facility as a response to the legal concept of cruel and unusual punishment.Thoroughlyprovided a rationale for your position with concrete examples.

4. Defend or critique whether programs and amenities geared to making prison life effective—which run the gamut from hiring extra officers, to counseling and therapy, to building a garden—are time and taxpayer money well spent.

Weight: 25%

Did not submit or incompletely defended or critiqued whether programs and amenities geared to making prison life effective—which run the gamut from hiring extra officers, to counseling and therapy, to building a garden—are time and taxpayer money well spent.

Insufficiently defended or critiqued whether programs and amenities geared to making prison life effective—which run the gamut from hiring extra officers, to counseling and therapy, to building a garden—are time and tax-payer money well spent.

Partially defended or critiqued whether programs and amenities geared to making prison life effective—which run the gamut from hiring extra officers, to counseling and therapy, to building a garden—are time and tax-payer money well spent.

Satisfactorily defended or critiqued whether programs and amenities geared to making prison life effective—which run the gamut from hiring extra officers, to counseling and therapy, to building a garden—are time and tax-payer money well spent.

Thoroughly defended or critiqued whether programs and amenities geared to making prison life effective—which run the gamut from hiring extra officers, to counseling and therapy, to building a garden—are time and tax-payer money well spent.

5. 3 references

Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.

Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 8 errors present

7-8 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present

Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our Guarantees

At 111papers.com, we value all our customers, and for that, always strive to ensure that we deliver the best top-quality content that we can. All the processes, from writing, formatting, editing, and submission is 100% original and detail-oriented. With us, you are, therefore, always guaranteed quality work by certified and experienced writing professionals. We take pride in the university homework help services that we provide our customers.

Money-Back Guarantee

As the best homework help service in the world, 111 Papers ensures that all customers are completely satisfied with the finished product before disbursing payment. You are not obligated to pay for the final product if you aren’t 100% satisfied with the paper. We also provide a money-back guarantee if you don’t feel that your paper was written to your satisfaction. This guarantee is totally transparent and follows all the terms and conditions set by the company.

Read more

Zero-Plagiarism Guarantee

All products that we deliver are guaranteed to be 100% original. We check for unoriginality on all orders delivered by our writers using the most advanced anti-plagiarism programs in the market. We, therefore, guarantee that all products that we submit to you are 100% original. We have a zero-tolerance policy for copied content. Thanks to our strict no plagiarized work rule, you can submit your homework to your professor without worrying.

Read more

Free-Revision Policy

TThis is one of the most cherished courtesy services that we provide to help ensure that our customers are completely satisfied with our finished products. Delivering the best final product to our customers takes multiple inputs. 111papers.com prides itself on delivering the best university homework help services in the writing industry. And, in part, our free revision policy is how we do it. What’s more, all our revisions are 100% free without any strings attached.

Read more

Privacy Policy

Client privacy is important to use. We know and understand just how important customers value their privacy and always want to safeguard their personal information. Thus, all the information that you share with us will always remain in safe custody. We will never disclose your personal information to any third party or sell your details to anyone. 111 Papers uses the most sophisticated, top-of-the-line security programs to ensure that our customers’ information is safe and secured.

Read more

Fair-Cooperation Guarantee

Placing your order with us means that you agree with the homework help service we provide. We, in turn, will endear to ensure that we do everything we can to deliver the most comprehensive finished product as per your requirements. We will also count on your cooperation to help us deliver on this mandate. Yes, we also need you to ensure that you have the highest-quality paper.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency