Capstone project milestone #3: educating staff: implementing change

Capstone Project Milestone #3:

Connect with a professional writer in 5 simple steps

Please provide as many details about your writing struggle as possible

Academic level of your paper

Type of Paper

When is it due?

How many pages is this assigment?

Educating Staff: Implementing Change Guidelines

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to create the Educating Staff: Implementing Change Project PowerPoint presentation. Your plan is to educate the staff that will be involved in the pilot program. You will need to educate them on the problem, show the supporting evidence, and how your pilot plan will be implemented.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following Course Outcomes.

CO2: Proposes leadership and collaboration strategies for use with consumers and other healthcare providers in managing care and/or delegating responsibilities for health promotion, illness prevention, health restoration and maintenance, and rehabilitative activities. (PO #2)

CO3: Communicates effectively with patient populations and other healthcare providers in managing the healthcare of individuals, families, aggregates, and communities. (PO #3)

CO7: Integrates the professional role of leader, teacher, communicator, and manager of care to plan cost-effective, quality healthcare to consumers in structured and unstructured settings. (PO #7)

 

Due Date

Milestone #3 consists of the PowerPoint presentation Educating Staff: Implementing Change Project. Submit this Milestone to the Dropbox by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 6.

Points

Milestone #3 is worth 225 points.

Directions

1.    Create an educational presentation for staff before the launch of your change project. This should inform the staff of the problem, your potential solution, and their role in change project.

2.    The format for this proposal will be a PowerPoint presentation.

3.    The length of the PowerPoint presentation should be 15-20 slides; excluding the title and reference slides.

4.    Below are the topics for the slides:

a.    Title slide

b.    Description of the change model used

c.    PICO question—include the elements

d.    Scope of the problem—use statistics

e.    Your team/stakeholders

f.     Evidence to support your need for change—from research

g.    Action Plan

h.    Timeline for the plan

i.      The nurses role and responsibility in the pilot program

j.      Procedure

k.    Forms that will be used (if applicable)

l.      Resources available to the staff—including yourself

m.   Summary

n.    References

5.    Citations and References must be included to support the information within each topic area. Refer to the APA manual, Chapter 7, for examples of proper reference format. Citations are to be noted for all information contained in your paper that is not your original idea or thought. Ask yourself, “How do I know this?” and then cite the source. Scholarly sources are expected, which means choose peer-reviewed journals and credible websites.

Guidelines

·         Application: Use Microsoft PowerPoint 2010.

·         Length: The PowerPoint slide show is expected to be between 15-20 slides in length (not including the title slide and reference list slide).

·         Submission: Submit your files via the basket in the Dropbox: “Educating the Staff: Implementing the Change Project” by 11:59 p.m. Sunday of Week 6.

·         Late Submission: See the course policy on late submissions.

·         Tutorial: If needed, Microsoft Office has many templates and tutorials to help you get started.

Best Practices in Preparing a PowerPoint Presentation

The following are best practices in preparing this project.

1.    Slides should be easy to read with short bullet points and large font. Do not use paragraphs.

2.    Be creative, but realistic with your intervention and evaluation tool.

3.    Incorporate graphics, clip art, or photographs to increase interest.

4.    Review directions thoroughly.

5.    Cite all sources within the slide show with in-text citations, as well as a reference page.

6.    Proofread prior to final submission.

7.    Spell check for spelling and grammar errors prior to final submission.

8.    Abide by the Chamberlain College of Nursing academic integrity policy.

 

Grading Criteria: Educating Staff: Implementing Change

Category

Points

%

Description

The Problem

30

13%

Summary of change model discussed. PICO question including elements. Scope of the problem includes statistics and scope of problem to healthcare as a whole discussed. Team and stakeholders and their role/reason chosen.

The Evidence

40

18%

Discussion of the evidence is done in terms of themes. Pertinent information is summarized. Sources are not listed individually but synthesized into concepts discovered. At least four sources used (at least three peer reviews and the other a credible resource).

The Plan

40

18%

Plan of action described. Important elements are discussed and logical. Timeline is thorough and contains all elements. Timeline is logical and appropriate.

The Nurse’s Role

30

13%

The nurse’s role in the pilot plan is described and clear. Procedures for the pilot plan are clear and concise.

Resources

20

9%

Form for tracking the outcomes is included. Resources the nurses will need are included. At least three resources are included. The nurse investigator, the team, internet resources, or other resources the staff needs is included.

Summary

10

5%

Summary slide reiterates the problem and purpose of the plan along with the measurable goals.

Overall Presentation

25

11%

Presentation is presented in a clear and logical manner. PowerPoint is appealing to the eye and includes creativity. Font is easy to read.

Mechanics

30

13%

Includes title slide. Grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure are correct. References are properly cited within the paper. Reference page includes all citations. Evidence of spell and grammar check.

Total

225 points

100%

 

 

Grading Rubric: Educating the staff Milestone #3

Criteria

A

(92–100%)

Outstanding or highest level of performance

B

(84–91%)

Very good or high level of performance

C

(76–83%)

Competent or satisfactory level of performance

F

(0–75%)

Poor or failing or unsatisfactory level of performance

Pts

The Problem

30 points

* Summary of change model discussed

(1 slide)

* PICO question including elements (1 slide)

* Scope of the problem includes statistics and scope of problem to healthcare as a whole discussed. (1-2 slides)

* Team and stakeholders and their role/reason chosen

(1 slide)

(28–30 points)

* One of the four elements was not thorough or did not include all appropriate elements.

(25–27 points)

* Two of the four elements was not thorough or did not include all appropriate elements.

(23–24 points)

* Three or more of the four elements was not thorough or did not include all appropriate elements.

(0–22 points)

/30

The Evidence

40 points

Discussion of the evidence is done in terms of themes. Pertinent information is summarized. Sources are not listed individually but synthesized into concepts. At least four sources used (at least three peer reviews and the other is a credible resource).

(3–4 slides)

(37–40 points)

Four sources are discussed but evidence is not synthesized into themes learned.

(34–36 points)

Four sources are discussed but evidence is not synthesized or summarized.

(30–33 points)

Not all four sources are discussed. Summary of information not detailed or pertinent.

(0–29 points)

/40

The Plan

40 points

* Plan of action described. Important elements are discussed and logical.

(1-2 slide)

* Timeline is thorough and contains all elements. Timeline is logical and appropriate.

(1 slide)

(37–40 points)

* Plan of action described but not all important elements included. OR

* Timeline is present but doesn’t contain all elements.

(34–36 points)

* Plan of action described but not all important elements included. AND

* Timeline is present but doesn’t contain all elements.

(30–33 points)

Plan of action not present or not logical and complete. The timeline is not present or not appropriate and logical.

(0–29 points)

/40

The Nurse’s Role

30 points

* The nurse’s role in the pilot plan is described and clear.

(1 slide)

* Procedures for the pilot plan are clear and concise.

(2-3 slides)

(28–30 points)

* The nurses’ role is describes but not clear.

OR

* Procedures are discussed but not clear.

(25–27 points)

* The nurses’ role is describes but not clear.

AND

* Procedures are discussed but not clear.

(23–24 points)

Nurses’ roles are either absent or not appropriate. Procedures are either absent or not clearly written and complete.

(0–22 points)

/30

Resources

  20 points

* Form for tracking the outcomes is included.

(1 slide)

* Resources the nurses will need are included. At least three resources are included. The nurse investigator, the team, internet resources, or other resources the staff needs is included.

(1 slide)

(18–20 points)

* Form for tracking outcomes included.

*At least three resources are included but the resources were not the best available resources.  

(16–17 points)

* Form for tracking outcomes included but was not well-developed.  

*At least three resources are included but the resources were not the best available resources.

(15 points)

* Form for tracking outcomes either absent or not well-developed.

* Less than three appropriate and helpful resources were given.

(0–14 points)

/20

Summary

10 points

Summary slide reiterates the problem and purpose of the plan along with the measurable goals. (1-2 slides)

(9–10 points)

Summary does not clearly reiterate the problem OR purpose.

(8 points)

Lacks reiteration of problem AND purpose.

(7 points)

Summary slide not present or incomplete.

(0–6 points)

/10

Overall presentation

25 points

Presentation is presented in a clear and logical manner. PowerPoint is appealing to the eye and includes creativity. Font is easy to read.

(23–25 points)

Presentation is accurate and covers most elements but lacks creativity.

(21–22 points)

Presentation lacks flow and creativity or is difficult to follow.

(19–20 points)

Presentation lacks any attempt at organization and comes across as chaotic.

(0–18 points)

/25

Mechanics

30 points

Includes title slide (3 points)

Grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure are correct.

(9 points)

References properly cited within the paper.

(6 points)

Reference page includes all citations.

(6 points)

Evidence of spell and grammar check.

(6 points)

(28–30 total points)

Title slide incomplete

Minimal errors in grammar, punctuation, and/or sentence structure noted.

Citations are present but not correct format.

References are present, with minimal errors in format.

(25–27 points)

Missing title slide

Multiple grammar and punctuation errors noted.

(23–24 points)

Title slide and citations are missing.

References are missing or incomplete.

No evidence of proof-reading prior to submitting paper.

(0–2 points)

/30

Total points:

 

 

 

 

/225

 

Reference:

 

 

Dearholt, S. L., & Dang, D. (2012).Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence Based Practice: Model and Guidelines (2nd ed.).Indianapolis, IN: Sigma Theta Tau International.

Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our Guarantees

At 111papers.com, we value all our customers, and for that, always strive to ensure that we deliver the best top-quality content that we can. All the processes, from writing, formatting, editing, and submission is 100% original and detail-oriented. With us, you are, therefore, always guaranteed quality work by certified and experienced writing professionals. We take pride in the university homework help services that we provide our customers.

Money-Back Guarantee

As the best homework help service in the world, 111 Papers ensures that all customers are completely satisfied with the finished product before disbursing payment. You are not obligated to pay for the final product if you aren’t 100% satisfied with the paper. We also provide a money-back guarantee if you don’t feel that your paper was written to your satisfaction. This guarantee is totally transparent and follows all the terms and conditions set by the company.

Read more

Zero-Plagiarism Guarantee

All products that we deliver are guaranteed to be 100% original. We check for unoriginality on all orders delivered by our writers using the most advanced anti-plagiarism programs in the market. We, therefore, guarantee that all products that we submit to you are 100% original. We have a zero-tolerance policy for copied content. Thanks to our strict no plagiarized work rule, you can submit your homework to your professor without worrying.

Read more

Free-Revision Policy

TThis is one of the most cherished courtesy services that we provide to help ensure that our customers are completely satisfied with our finished products. Delivering the best final product to our customers takes multiple inputs. 111papers.com prides itself on delivering the best university homework help services in the writing industry. And, in part, our free revision policy is how we do it. What’s more, all our revisions are 100% free without any strings attached.

Read more

Privacy Policy

Client privacy is important to use. We know and understand just how important customers value their privacy and always want to safeguard their personal information. Thus, all the information that you share with us will always remain in safe custody. We will never disclose your personal information to any third party or sell your details to anyone. 111 Papers uses the most sophisticated, top-of-the-line security programs to ensure that our customers’ information is safe and secured.

Read more

Fair-Cooperation Guarantee

Placing your order with us means that you agree with the homework help service we provide. We, in turn, will endear to ensure that we do everything we can to deliver the most comprehensive finished product as per your requirements. We will also count on your cooperation to help us deliver on this mandate. Yes, we also need you to ensure that you have the highest-quality paper.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency