Do training evaluation discussion and reply to donalds & kathryns


Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Do training evaluation discussion and reply to donalds & kathryns
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

What is the relationship among Kirkpatrick’s four levels of  evaluation? Would you argue for examining all four levels, even if your  boss suggested you should look only at the last one (results) and, that  if it improved, you would know that training had an impact? Provide at  least one example (e.g., tool, device, etc.) that would be used to  gather evaluation data at each level.

Your initial post should be 250 to 300 words. Use this week’s lecture  as a foundation for your initial post. In addition to the Blanchard and  Thacker (2013) text, use at least one additional scholarly source to  support your discussion.

Respond to at least two other posts regarding items you found to be  compelling and enlightening. To help you with your reply, please  consider the following questions:

  • What did you learn from the posting?
  • What additional questions do you have after reading the posting?
  • What clarification do you need regarding the posting?
  • What differences or similarities do you see between your initial discussion thread and your classmates’ postings?

Your reply posts to Donald and Kathryn should be a minimum of 150

 words each 

Donalds Discussion:


Kirkpatrick’s four levels of evaluation are; Reaction, Learning, behavior and the result of the evaluation.

Reaction- this level is more appealing to employees that are  participating in the training. Instructors want the trainee to be able  to learn all they can, as the trainee will react to every training  program. In that reaction, the understanding that the trainee has is  assessed and which of the topics that need improvement will be outlined.

I would measure by; asking the trainees what they thought about the  class, the classroom environment, strengths and weaknesses, was the  learning style effective.

Learning- the degree in which trainees can obtain knowledge, skill or  attitudes(KSA’s). This degree is based on the trainees participation.  Starting with objectives, passing good information to trainees will get  them farther. Conducting a survey will collect the data needed to add  more lessons.

I would measure by; Assessing trainees knowledge before and after  training to see if they have retained some or all the information given.  I would also conduct a one on one interview to see if they can apply or  understood what was given.

Behavior- Can be assed by training on the job. Trainees will be  evaluated for knowledge and to see if the training has changed the  target behavior. If the behavior of the trainee hasn’t changed, it  doesn’t mean they haven’t learned anything.

I would measure by; Observing student behavior, do the trainees feel  that their behavior has changed somewhat, can they take everything they  have learned and teach it someone else?

Results of Evaluation- This is the degree of the outcome of  objectives that happens as a result of intended training. The  analyzation of the outcome is at this point because we find out if the  training was good for the employee or the company. A possible outcome  could be that if the training objectives were to reduce complaints, then  the result could be a decrease in complaints.

I would measure by; Increased productivity due to an increase in  moral, less employees leaving(employee retention), pleased customer  base/ customer service satisfaction.

The best tool that would incorporate all four levels would be  “Training Needs Analysis” because it covers the difference between what  the jobs needs and the trainees knowledge. Using it will find the  strengths and weaknesses. Kirkpatrick, D.L. (2006) state that,” so many  variables can be changing in fast-changing organizations that analysis  at level 4 can be limited in usefulness”.

Blanchard, P. N., & Thacker, J. W. (2013). Effective training:  Systems, strategies, and practices (5th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ:  Pearson Education, Inc.

Kirkpatrick, D. L. (2006, August). Seven keys to unlock the four  levels of evaluation. Performance Improvement, 45(7), 5-8. Retrieved  from the ProQuest database. 

Kathryns Discussion:


Blanchard  and Thacker (2013), list Kirkpatrick’s four training outcomes and the  factors that influence them as including reactions, learning, job  behaviors, and organizational results. According to Kirkpatrick (2006),  the four levels include reaction, learning, behavior, and results. 

Kirkpatrick  also discusses seven keys to implement the four levels which can  include analyze your resources, involve your managers, start at the  beginning and proceed as resources are available, evaluate reaction,  evaluate learning, evaluate behavior, and evaluate results (2006).

If  my boss told me to only consider the last level, results, I would  discuss the benefits to considering all levels due to so many factors  being at play that can influence the results. For  example, consider an employee’s previous experiences in training, which  can be factored in under the reaction and learning levels. If  the employee had previous experiences that were poor, their personal  attitudes can affect other trainees’ behaviors and attitudes which  effects the learning process and the ability to transfer of learning.  Results can also be skewed. For  example, consider the company that wants results based upon 30 day  supervisor evaluations after the trainees’ returns from training. If  the company isn’t factoring in a combination of supervisor opinions,  employee opinions, and statistical data, then the results can have flaws  or be invalid.  

Tools  and devices that can be used for the reaction level can involve surveys  after each module of training, or at the end of training. This  can indicate the employee’s perceptions of the training which is a good  predictor of the ability to apply the training upon return to the  workplace. For the learning level,  tools and devices that can be considered can include quizzes at the end  of each module to assess learning retention. For  behavior, trainers could use supervisor assessments from when the  trainees return to their workplace to see if the employees are doing  what they are supposed to, when, and how. Finally,  for evaluating results, statistical data should be used to verify  validity, rather than using opinions to justify if the training was  successful. 


Blanchard, P., Thacker, J. (2013). Effective Training. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson 


Kirkpatrick, D.L. (2006, August). Seven keys to unlock the four levels of evaluation. Performance Improvement, 45(7), 5-8. Retrieved from ProQuest database.

Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our Guarantees

At, we value all our customers, and for that, always strive to ensure that we deliver the best top-quality content that we can. All the processes, from writing, formatting, editing, and submission is 100% original and detail-oriented. With us, you are, therefore, always guaranteed quality work by certified and experienced writing professionals. We take pride in the university homework help services that we provide our customers.

Money-Back Guarantee

As the best homework help service in the world, 111 Papers ensures that all customers are completely satisfied with the finished product before disbursing payment. You are not obligated to pay for the final product if you aren’t 100% satisfied with the paper. We also provide a money-back guarantee if you don’t feel that your paper was written to your satisfaction. This guarantee is totally transparent and follows all the terms and conditions set by the company.

Read more

Zero-Plagiarism Guarantee

All products that we deliver are guaranteed to be 100% original. We check for unoriginality on all orders delivered by our writers using the most advanced anti-plagiarism programs in the market. We, therefore, guarantee that all products that we submit to you are 100% original. We have a zero-tolerance policy for copied content. Thanks to our strict no plagiarized work rule, you can submit your homework to your professor without worrying.

Read more

Free-Revision Policy

TThis is one of the most cherished courtesy services that we provide to help ensure that our customers are completely satisfied with our finished products. Delivering the best final product to our customers takes multiple inputs. prides itself on delivering the best university homework help services in the writing industry. And, in part, our free revision policy is how we do it. What’s more, all our revisions are 100% free without any strings attached.

Read more

Privacy Policy

Client privacy is important to use. We know and understand just how important customers value their privacy and always want to safeguard their personal information. Thus, all the information that you share with us will always remain in safe custody. We will never disclose your personal information to any third party or sell your details to anyone. 111 Papers uses the most sophisticated, top-of-the-line security programs to ensure that our customers’ information is safe and secured.

Read more

Fair-Cooperation Guarantee

Placing your order with us means that you agree with the homework help service we provide. We, in turn, will endear to ensure that we do everything we can to deliver the most comprehensive finished product as per your requirements. We will also count on your cooperation to help us deliver on this mandate. Yes, we also need you to ensure that you have the highest-quality paper.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages